我的一个程序里有个方法比较耗时,
调试发现是new string比较耗时间,
比如以下代码
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
byte[] bytes = {1,2,3,4};
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
String string = new String(bytes, 2, 2);
// String string = "test";
sb.append(string);
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(end - start);
用new string的话要60毫秒,
而直接用test的话只要16毫秒,
问题是我必需从bytes中取得后面两位的数据, 前面两位没有用,
有什么办法优化吗?StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
char[] bytes = {1,2,3,4};
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
sb.append(bytes, 2, 2);
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(end - start);
只要5ms
int是可以直接当做char的
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
byte[] bytes = {1,2,3,4};
String string=null;
for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
string = new String(bytes, 2, 2);
sb.append(string);
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(end - start);
public static void main(String[] args) {
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
byte[] bytes = { 1, 2, 3, 4 };
byte[] target = new byte[1024 * 1024];
int currentIndex = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; i++) {
if(currentIndex + 2 > target.length){
byte[] newTarget = new byte[target.length * 3 / 2];
System.arraycopy(target, 0, newTarget, 0, currentIndex);
target = newTarget;
}
System.arraycopy(bytes, 2, target, currentIndex, 2);
currentIndex += 2;
}
String str = new String(target, 0, currentIndex);
System.out.println(str.length());
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();创建String对象放在for循环外,append 100000次就可以了String string = new String(bytes, 2, 2);
放在for外面,
还是说bytes每次不一样?![]()